Yes, In the Market Consensus view, we could expect that making a change to the rules that are enforced (“experimenting”) would be considered a risk. This risk would be balanced against the potential gain from making the change, or conversely the risk of doing nothing. So the Market Consensus view could expect Bitcoin to be resistant to change until the reason for change becomes compelling.

I don’t think the Market Consensus viewpoint necessarily implies favoring “Medium of Exchange” properties. It is the subjective judgement of those willing to assign value that determines what properties are valued.

I think that the Extreme Consensus perspective tends to favor “store of value” properties just as an reflection of the empirical fact the the block size limit currently exists, and thus resisting change forces that view to support whatever properties happen to result from keeping the block size limit in place.